Philosophy & Religion
157,517 views
31 min · 2 min read
9 steps
Advanced

How to develop a personal ethical decision checklist based on moral philosophy

Developing a personal ethical decision checklist helps you act consistently and confidently when faced with moral choices. This short guide walks you through steps rooted in core moral philosophies so you can create a compact, practical tool to use in everyday life.

Verified by pleasexplain editors
  1. Step 1: Clarify your values

    List 6–10 values that matter to you (e.g., honesty, care, fairness). Spend 20–30 minutes reflecting and ranking them by importance to create a stable reference for decisions.

    [Illustration: A person writing a ranked list of values on paper with a timer set to 25 minutes.]

  2. Step 2: Learn core theories

    Spend 1–2 hours reviewing four basic moral theories: utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and care ethics. Note one practical takeaway from each to inform your checklist.

    [Illustration: Four labeled cards representing utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and care ethics on a table.]

  3. Step 3: Extract key questions

    From each theory, write 1–2 questions you can use in decisions (total 6–8 questions). For example: ‘Who benefits and by how much?’ and ‘Would I want this rule made universal?’

    [Illustration: Close-up of a notebook page with six concise ethical questions handwritten.]

  4. Step 4: Draft the checklist

    Combine your top 6–9 questions and 3 value reminders into a single one-page checklist. Limit it to 8–10 items so it can be used in under 2 minutes during a decision.

    [Illustration: A one-page checklist with 8 lines and a pen ready to sign.]

  5. Step 5: Test with past cases

    Apply the checklist to 3–5 past decisions (10–15 minutes each) and note differences in judgment. Adjust questions that lead to unclear answers or repeat information.

    [Illustration: A person comparing sticky notes labeled with past decisions and checklist results.]

  6. Step 6: Pilot in real situations

    Use the checklist for two weeks on daily low-stakes choices and one high-stakes decision. Record time to use it and whether outcomes align with your values.

    [Illustration: A calendar marked two weeks with check marks and a clipboard holding the checklist.]

  7. Step 7: Refine and shorten

    After testing, remove redundant items and simplify wording to 6–8 concise prompts that take under 90 seconds to work through. Aim for clarity over philosophical jargon.

    [Illustration: A revised checklist being edited with a red pen to shorten sentences.]

  8. Step 8: Create an accessible format

    Make a pocket-sized card, phone note, or desktop poster of the checklist. Ensure font is readable and carry it for 30 days to build the habit of consulting it.

    [Illustration: A small laminated checklist card fitting inside a wallet beside a smartphone.]

  9. Step 9: Schedule periodic review

    Set calendar reminders every 3 months for a 30-minute review to update the checklist as your values or circumstances change. Track 3 examples where you applied it between reviews.

    [Illustration: A digital calendar open to a quarterly reminder with a 30-minute block highlighted.]


  • Keep items succinct: 6–8 words each to read quickly.
  • Use simple scoring (yes/no/unsure) to speed decisions.
  • Include at least one question about short- and long-term consequences.
  • Pair the checklist with a 60–90 second pause ritual to avoid snap reactions.
  • Write the checklist in first person for personal resonance (e.g., ‘Do I respect dignity?’).
  • Ask a trusted friend to review the checklist once to catch blind spots.
  • Keep a one-page log of 10–15 applications to spot patterns and bias.
  • If overwhelmed, apply only the top 3 items for immediate action and revisit later.

  • A checklist cannot replace legal or professional advice in high-risk situations.
  • Avoid making the list so long that you never use it; more than 10 items reduces practicality.
  • Be wary of confirmation bias: don’t only use the checklist to justify a previously chosen action.
  • Do not assume philosophical concepts are fixed; misinterpretation can lead to contradictory prompts.

Was this guide helpful?